Body Armor News
Body Armor Body Armor News Body Armor Advertising Body Armor Manufacturer Contact Body Armor Seller
Body Armor News
Body Armor News Body Armor News Body Armor News
Body Armor Links
HOW DOES IT WORK?
DEVELOPMENTS
MANUFACTURERS
POST ARMOR REQUEST
RESOURCES
TENDERS
EXHIBITIONS
VIDEOS
LINKS
SITEMAP
Body Armor News
 
February 2 2012
Damages from Kolon to DuPont Over Kevlar Backed by Judge
January 23 2012
Pacific Safety Products Inc. Enters Into Letter of Intent
January 21 2012
BAE receives new order for body armor
January 18 2012
Point Blank Enterprises and Protective Products Enterprises Highlight New Comprehensive Line of Body Armor Systems and Accessories at SHOT Show 2012
January 4 2012
Madisonville officers get body armor
 
Body Armor News

 

 

 
Troops Reject New Body Armor as Dangerous
March 28, 2006

The new, heavier, body armor arriving in Iraq is creating a potential public relations problem. Many of the troops don't want to wear the new stuff. Why? Because the heavier new armor could get them killed. The new protective vests includes side armor. 
 
Side armor, which adds about ten pounds to the 16 pound weight of the Interceptor Protective Vest, has been available since 2003 (when 250 sets were sent to Iraq.) About a thousand sets were delivered in 2004, and more last year. Side armor is obviously not new, but its availability has not been widespread. While the side armor provided useful protection, the added weight (for a trooper already carrying over fifty pounds), and material, restricts movement. The new armor is most popular with those guarding convoys. These troops spend most of their time sitting down, and the side armor provides additional protection from roadside bombs, which throw out a lot of fragments, at troops sitting facing forward. The bombs are often accompanied by an ambush force armed with machine-guns and assault rifles. Sometimes, the troops have to get out of their vehicles and battle the ambushers. This is often intense and disorganized combat, with fire coming from all directions. Again, the side armor can be very useful. But the troops won't be running around so long that the additional weight and movement restriction will become a major problem. For the same reason, combat troops that are spending most of their time in their vehicles, don't mind the disadvantages of the side armor. But infantry that are out running around most of the time, going up stairs, through windows and battling the enemy in an urban environment, nimbleness is more important. Some of these guys have been known to leave the back plate, or even the front plate, out, just to save a few pounds. Not being able to scramble through a window in time can get you killed, as can many battlefield maneuvers that put a premium on speed and maneuverability. American commandoes, including Special Forces, often go into action without the body armor, because the consider mobility more important. 

These different attitudes towards how much armor to wear are similar to those found in police forces. That's why the police have both lightweight armor (worn by most cops, most of the time) and heavier rigs for SWAT teams or anyone out on a raid, and even heavier getup for bomb disposal personnel.

The senior commanders are under a lot of pressure to "protect the troops." Many people back home have invested a lot of themselves in efforts to get better armor for the troops. Hearing that the troops value lightness and speed, over armor and more weight, will upset some politicians and pundits. But if the opinions of the troops counts for anything, weight matters, often more than anything else.

 
Download NIJ Standard
EnGarde DeLuxe

Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash player

FNH USA
 
Body Armor News
Body Armor News
Body Armor News
Body Armor News
Body Armor News
Body Armor News
Body Armor News
Body Armor News
Body Armor News
Body Armor News
Body Armor News Body Armor News Body Armor News Body Armor News